Now it seems the shadowy (and probably very dusty) recesses of what passes for my mind are dwelling on the world of e-books. When I woke at half past three this morning I had been dreaming of reading an article on e-books. There were two points that struck me:
- Any woman seen with an e-reader in public at the moment will be assumed to be reading porn.
- What are the long-term implications for charity shops? Second-hand bookshops, too, although those seem to be like hen's teeth round my way. If e-books come to dominate the market, donations to charity shops will dwindle. I still haven't got an e-reader (hypocrite! I hear you cry) but I imagine that once you've read a book you don't want to read again it's just deleted. If it was a paper book (I was going to write 'proper book', but that's surely opening up a can of worms best left undisturbed by an indie author) it would, I hope, end up being passed on rather than binned. I don't have any statistics, but I should think books bring in a steady revenue for charities. Even people who actively avoid manically over-familiar persons in aggressively bright tabards may end up handing over a fair bit of cash to charity in their thirst for reading matter. What happens when they no longer have a reason to cross the threshold for a browse?
I was so struck by these points that, in my dream, I began to read the article aloud to my mother. As is the way of dreams, at this point the article became one about market gardening, written phonetically in an obscure Scottish dialect, and as such became irrelevant to this post.
I'm still worried about what reading a Kindle on the train would do for my street cred, though.
Charities might do better as old books become rare and sought after - as long as they don't become TOO rare and valuable.
ReplyDeleteLots of readers prefer print books. I do myself for my favourites.
But do you think that, as e-books become more dominant, people will be willing to pay twice to have a paper copy of something they've enjoyed on screen?
ReplyDelete