"Find your voice!" the writing handbooks say. Which is fair enough. But there's more.
"Find the voice of your characters!" OK, yes, reading it back they seem to be distinct personalities. Next.
"Find your narrative voice!"
Ah.
Looking for Buttons was written in the first person, narrated by Kate, the central character. I like first person narrative, I like its immediacy and intrinsic bias. It's why I prefer Ice Station Zebra to Where Eagles Dare, although filmwise I'd call it the other way. (Yes, I do realise that writers of romantic comedy do not as a rule cite Alistair MacLean as their writing inspiration, but I am nothing if not, erm, yes, you could say odd.) The Difficult Second Novel, which has more in common with MacLean and Adam Hall than with Looking for Buttons, has a first person narrative. So, first problem - does the narrator of the DSN sound too much like Kate, i.e. do both books in fact just sound like me?
The Difficult Third Novel is shaping up to follow Looking for Buttons into the chick lit genre, but it's written in the third person, with an all-seeing impartial narrator (a bit like David Attenborough, only without the charm and erudition). Reading it back, it's OK, but it's not quite right. So, second problem - should I rewrite it from the point of view of the central character and see if that sorts it out? Which itself brings me to the third problem, which is actually the first problem all over again.
I feel I should draw a flow chart at this point, but that's just the latent scientist in me, and if I sit quietly with my copy of Doctor Faustus for a minute the feeling will pass.
It's not enough just to put words on a page in the right order. You've got to throw your voice at the same time. But if you don't get it right it turns into a boomerang and comes back to clout you round the ear.
It's enough to drive you to drink a gottle of geer.
Showing posts with label Kate Harper. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kate Harper. Show all posts
Friday, 17 August 2012
Gottle of geer
Labels:
Adam Hall,
Alistair MacLean,
chick lit,
Difficult Second Novel,
Difficult Third Novel,
fiction,
Kate Harper,
Looking For Buttons,
narrative voice,
novels,
romantic fiction,
spy fiction,
storytelling,
writing
Wednesday, 11 July 2012
The pros and cons of sticking with what you know
I have a confession to make: I haven't actually written anything new since last year. I'd lost confidence and had pretty much decided to call it a day. However, the same compulsion that has been known to find me scribbling by torchlight at three in the morning led me to have one last try. I'd put Looking for Buttons on Amazon as a Kindle e-book and if no-one bought it, that would be the end of my writing career. To my delighted surprise, people are buying it. (Thank you!)
And suddenly I've started writing again. There's this blog and random appearances on Twitter as looking4buttons, and then, very late last night, I dug out part of the Difficult Second Novel. I read it with a little difficulty, as the only reason the laptop was still on was that I'd been lying in the dark to catch up with the fabulously titled Before the Screaming Begins on BBC iPlayer and hadn't got my glasses on. Even so, as I squinted at the screen, I realised it wasn't as bad as I'd thought. It was written so long ago I was coming to it fresh and I found I wanted to know what happens next (it would help considerably if I've got to write it). Better still, the narrator's voice was completely distinct from Looking for Buttons's Kate Harper. The book seems to be a runner after all.
Which puts me in a dilemma. Should I dust off the first ten chapters of the Difficult Second Novel and try to produce the rest of the book, or should I keep it on the back burner and carry on with the Difficult Third Novel, currently standing at a chapter and a half? The DTN is probably going to end up falling broadly into the romance genre, meaning I could pitch it to the Looking for Buttons audience, hopefully resulting in a book that sells. The DSN, however, is a thriller set in the 1970s, requiring a different pseudonym and a lot of research (watching re-runs of The Professionals is research, really it is, not an obsession at all, no).
I need to make a decision and soon. Inside my head I can hear Gladys Knight and the Pips singing Come Back And Finish What You Started. I can't decide if that's a sign that I need to take up the Difficult Second Novel once more or if my subconscious is desperate to hear a bit of Motown.
And suddenly I've started writing again. There's this blog and random appearances on Twitter as looking4buttons, and then, very late last night, I dug out part of the Difficult Second Novel. I read it with a little difficulty, as the only reason the laptop was still on was that I'd been lying in the dark to catch up with the fabulously titled Before the Screaming Begins on BBC iPlayer and hadn't got my glasses on. Even so, as I squinted at the screen, I realised it wasn't as bad as I'd thought. It was written so long ago I was coming to it fresh and I found I wanted to know what happens next (it would help considerably if I've got to write it). Better still, the narrator's voice was completely distinct from Looking for Buttons's Kate Harper. The book seems to be a runner after all.
Which puts me in a dilemma. Should I dust off the first ten chapters of the Difficult Second Novel and try to produce the rest of the book, or should I keep it on the back burner and carry on with the Difficult Third Novel, currently standing at a chapter and a half? The DTN is probably going to end up falling broadly into the romance genre, meaning I could pitch it to the Looking for Buttons audience, hopefully resulting in a book that sells. The DSN, however, is a thriller set in the 1970s, requiring a different pseudonym and a lot of research (watching re-runs of The Professionals is research, really it is, not an obsession at all, no).
I need to make a decision and soon. Inside my head I can hear Gladys Knight and the Pips singing Come Back And Finish What You Started. I can't decide if that's a sign that I need to take up the Difficult Second Novel once more or if my subconscious is desperate to hear a bit of Motown.
Labels:
Amazon,
books,
chick lit,
creative process,
Difficult Second Novel,
Difficult Third Novel,
e-book,
fiction,
Kate Harper,
Kindle,
Looking For Buttons,
looking4buttons,
romance,
thrillers,
Twitter,
writing
Tuesday, 10 July 2012
Keeping reality at bay
One of the joys of fiction is that it can transport you utterly to another place, another time, even inside the mind of another person. However, the alchemy is a fragile process and it doesn't take much to shatter it. Sometimes all it takes is a tiny reminder of the outside world.
The means of communication used by the characters in Looking for Buttons may strike some readers as a little behind the times: they text and e-mail and sometimes (heaven forfend!) actually talk to each other. No-one tweets or posts status updates to Facebook. This was deliberate. It is not just that I am a dinosaur (an eleanorbrontesaurus, perhaps). As I wrote, I was aware that techonology moves on apace and using the wrong gadget would date it far more than the actions of the characters. (One of my guinea pigs was quick to point out that at one point Kate Harper, the narrator, was watching a video rather than a DVD. I didn't even consider bringing Blu-Ray into it.) Even so, I'd far rather that someone thought I was a little old-fashioned than be jolted out of the book completely by something being so odd that it made them question the workings of the world within the book.
And what prompted this post? It wasn't even a book I've read. No, it's the behemoth that is Fifty Shade of Grey (again). And the thought that is going to prevent me ever being able to buy into the story, should I read it, is this:
What does Christian Grey's cleaner think of it all? Or does he dust his dungeon himself?
It never does to have a practical nature when dealing with escapist fiction.
The means of communication used by the characters in Looking for Buttons may strike some readers as a little behind the times: they text and e-mail and sometimes (heaven forfend!) actually talk to each other. No-one tweets or posts status updates to Facebook. This was deliberate. It is not just that I am a dinosaur (an eleanorbrontesaurus, perhaps). As I wrote, I was aware that techonology moves on apace and using the wrong gadget would date it far more than the actions of the characters. (One of my guinea pigs was quick to point out that at one point Kate Harper, the narrator, was watching a video rather than a DVD. I didn't even consider bringing Blu-Ray into it.) Even so, I'd far rather that someone thought I was a little old-fashioned than be jolted out of the book completely by something being so odd that it made them question the workings of the world within the book.
And what prompted this post? It wasn't even a book I've read. No, it's the behemoth that is Fifty Shade of Grey (again). And the thought that is going to prevent me ever being able to buy into the story, should I read it, is this:
What does Christian Grey's cleaner think of it all? Or does he dust his dungeon himself?
It never does to have a practical nature when dealing with escapist fiction.
Labels:
books,
cleaners,
escapism,
fiction,
Fifty Shades of Grey,
Kate Harper,
Looking For Buttons,
reality,
technology,
writing
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)